We've touched a few times on trying to get rid of the
sleep-awhile-and-check-for-something-to-do loops in PG's auxiliary
processes, mainly to satisfy people who complain about CPU power
consumption when idle. I can see how most of the something-to-do
checks can be reimplemented using latches, but up to now there
didn't seem to be a good way to get rid of waking up every so often
to check if the postmaster was still there. So it got my attention
when someone mentioned this Linux syscall on a Red Hat mailing list:
NAME prctl - operations on a process
SYNOPSIS #include <sys/prctl.h>
int prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4, unsigned long
arg5);
... The first argument can be:
...
PR_SET_PDEATHSIG (since Linux 2.1.57) Set the parent process death signal of the calling process
to arg2 (either a signal value in the range 1..maxsig, or 0 to clear). This is the
signalthat the calling process will get when its parent dies. This value is cleared for the child of a
fork(2).
IOW, at least on Linux, you *can* arrange to get a signal when your
parent process dies.
Not sure how ugly it'd be to use this call when available and a time
delay when not, but it's something to think about.
regards, tom lane