Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Дата
Msg-id 7688.1259531189@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions  (Kurt Harriman <harriman@acm.org>)
Ответы Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Список pgsql-hackers
Kurt Harriman <harriman@acm.org> writes:
> (Does anybody still use a C compiler that doesn't support
> inline functions?)

The question isn't so much that, it's whether the compiler supports
inline functions with the same behavior as gcc.  At minimum that
would require* not generating extra copies of the function* not whining about unreferenced static functions
How many compilers have you tested this patch against?  Which ones
does it actually offer any benefit for?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Brendan Jurd
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cvs chapters in our docs
Следующее
От: Joshua Tolley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plperl and inline functions -- first draft