Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7678.1136226380@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? (Jon Jensen <jon@endpoint.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jon Jensen <jon@endpoint.com> writes:
> (1) What Tom proposed is that we store the hostname and do a new DNS
> lookup for every connection. That could be useful in certain situations,
> but I wouldn't use it for a busy production server. The additional time
> for DNS lookups (even with a fast local caching nameserver) would not be a
> price I'd want to pay for the convenience.
Can you demonstrate that this is actually a serious concern next to the
total time spent launching a backend? I can't measure any real change
in total time for "psql -l" when log_hostname is enabled, which should
be a comparable hit.
I started out proposing a one-line change. The odds of this ever
getting done drop by an order of magnitude every time someone proposes
another order-of-magnitude increase in the work required...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: