Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Yeah, what I've been thinking about in conjunction with similar problems
> is some sort of type registry, so that we could code for non-builtin
> types in certain cases. Maybe we should add that the the developers'
> meeting agenda.
Maybe. I don't want to see a json-specific hack for this, but some sort
of generic way to add type knowledge could be useful, if we could figure
out what we want.
regards, tom lane