Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7667.1384273791@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan? (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes:
> 2013/11/12 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> There's no possible way you'll finish this for 9.4.
> Yes, I understand it is not possible to submit whole of the patch until
> CF3 deadline. So, I'd like to find out a way to implement it as an
> extension using facilities being supported or to be enhanced on v9.4.
Oh! Okay, I misunderstood the context --- you meant this as an example
use-case for the custom plan feature, right? Makes more sense now.
I'm still dubious that it'd actually be very useful in itself, but it
seems reasonable as a test case to make sure that a set of hooks for
custom plans are sufficient to do something useful with.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: