Re: invalid UTF-8 via pl/perl

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: invalid UTF-8 via pl/perl
Дата
Msg-id 7619.1262549831@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: invalid UTF-8 via pl/perl  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> There are two issues with this patch. First, how far if at all should it 
> be backpatched? All the way, or 8.3, where we tightened the encoding 
> rules, or not at all?

Forgot to mention --- I'm not in favor of backpatching.  First because
tightening encoding verification has been a process over multiple
releases; it's not a bug fix in the normal sense of the word, and might
break things that people had been doing without trouble.  Second because
I think we'll have to change pg_verifymbstr's API, and that's not
something to back-patch if we can avoid it.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: invalid UTF-8 via pl/perl
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: ERROR: record type has not been registered