Re: Postgres IO sweet spot
| От | Riaan Stander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgres IO sweet spot |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7601f762-3449-4e66-9634-6f40afdc9b8f@exa.co.za обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Postgres IO sweet spot (Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Postgres IO sweet spot
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
We used to run a SAN shared between our host servers, but this was replaced with Storage Spaces. I think they don't trust Postgres native HA capabilities and want some hardware guarantee.That's an expensive way to provide some HA. What's the business requirement? How does that tie into Postgres? Might be able to do it in other ways.
I assume it will help, but I fear however that the overhead with a 3 way mirror is not going to be solved with just adding SSD. I'm trying to get them to rather deploy direct attached NVME/SSD to each Host and then use PG HA from there.Yikes! Yes, SSD would be a big win. It's orders of magnitude faster, and just removes so many problems.
It does take a lot of convincing and arguing though, so concrete number help get the point across.Sorry, I have no numbers to provide you there, but I cannot imagine any amount of tuning is going to be as big a win as going to SSD.
Thanks for the response
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: