Re: Order by optimisations?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Order by optimisations? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7590.1121403584@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Order by optimisations? (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Order by optimisations?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> OK, so what's going on here?
> usa=> explain select * from users_myfoods_map where user_id=1 and
> date='2003-11-03' order by date;
> QUERY PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sort (cost=4.84..4.85 rows=2 width=22)
> Sort Key: date
> -> Index Scan using users_myfoods_map_user_id_date_key on
> users_myfoods_map (cost=0.00..4.83 rows=2 width=22)
> Index Cond: ((user_id = 1) AND (date = '2003-11-03'::date))
> (4 rows)
Well, date evidently isn't the high-order key of this index. But why
exactly are you worried about a sort of 2 rows?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: