On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm not wedded to "forks", that's just the name that was used in the
> only previous example I've seen. Classic Mac had a "resource fork"
> and a "data fork" within each file.
>
> Don't think I like "maps" though, as (a) that prejudges what the
> alternate forks might be used for, and (b) the name fails to be
> inclusive of the data fork. Other suggestions anyone?
Shadow? As each err, fork trails each relfilenode? (Or perhaps "shade").
Hints? As something more generic than "map"?
Regards, Dawid