Re: Licensing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dawid Kuroczko
Тема Re: Licensing
Дата
Msg-id 758d5e7f05031102121dfd092f@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Licensing  ("James Tillman" <JamesTillman@sevatechnologies.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:01:47 -0500, James Tillman
<JamesTillman@sevatechnologies.com> wrote:
> I just wanted to say thanks to all who responded to my question regarding
> licensing.
>
> Although I'm fairly certain that it would be legal for my client to use
> MySQL in the manner we intended, despite what the sales rep said, the client
> doesn't like ambiguity, so we'll likely be going with PostgresQL, unless
> Oracle cuts them a nice deal!  (Client is heavily into Oracle).

If so, you would be much happier with PostgreSQL than MySQL.
IMHO PostgreSQL is much closer to Oracle than MySQL when it
comes to SQL.  Things like transactions, views, procedural languages,
referential integrity, triggers, etc. are either not done yet, in beta
stage or rarely used. :)

   Regards,
      Dawid

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jean-Paul Argudo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ?
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL and Patents: no position against ?