Re: Why does wait_for_log() return current file size
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why does wait_for_log() return current file size |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 7552b0a0-ed4c-45ed-95d6-c86baf771967@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why does wait_for_log() return current file size (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why does wait_for_log() return current file size
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-03-29 Sa 11:15 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi, In a test I'd like to use wait_for_log() to find a bunch of log messages emitted in sequence. A reasonable looking pattern for that would be: $log_location = -s $node->logfile; $log_location = $node->wait_for_log(qr/first-message/, $log_location); $log_location = $node->wait_for_log(qr/second-message/, $log_location); Except that that doesn't work, because what wait_for_log returns is: my $log = PostgreSQL::Test::Utils::slurp_file($self->logfile, $offset); return $offset + length($log) if ($log =~ m/$regexp/); Which, afaict, boils down to the current end of the logfile. Could we instead determine where in the string our regex matched, and return $offset + $that_magic_number Assuming that could be made work, does anybody see a reason not to do that?
In principle it seems quite reasonable, but I haven't looked at all the current uses to see if they will be upset.
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: