Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Paul Ramsey
Тема Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info
Дата
Msg-id 74C11775-67A7-48D2-B1E3-24C52A686F86@cleverelephant.ca
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Allowing extensions to supply operator-/function-specific info  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
A few more questions…

The documentation says that a support function should have a signature "supportfn(internal) returns internal”, but
doesn’tsay which (if any) annotations should be provided. IMMUTABLE? PARALLEL SAFE? STRICT? None? All? 

Variable SupportRequestCost is very exciting, but given that variable cost is usually driven by the complexity of
arguments,what kind of argument is the SupportRequestCost call fed during the planning stage? Constant arguments are
prettystraight forward, but what gets sent in when a column is one (or all) of the arguments?  

Thanks,
P



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling
Следующее
От: Andy Fan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: some hints to understand the plsql cursor.