-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Sunday, November 19, 2006 18:05:56 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> "SpamAssassin 3.0 supports SPF to detect and penalize header
>> forgery."
>
> I am painfully aware that SpamAssassin applies SPF. But that just shows
> that they are equally clueless because what they consider "header
> forgery" is another man's idea of privacy, freedom, and
> self-determination.
'k, so if I start sending emails out as peter_e@gmx.net, you'd have no problems
with that, sinc it could fall under my idea of 'privacy, freedom and
self-determination'? It would affect you, since I know *I* won't be getting
the angry messages back, or bounces, and for that reason alone, its generally
used by spammers ...
Show me an *ethical / legit* reason why I would want to send out email as
someone else? I personally can think of absolutely none ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFYKvF4QvfyHIvDvMRApFjAJ9rRMornNz0NEHvhLVkpwfxdAag0gCgiYe/
+i/2s0Wz8+iK9pdkASRO4IY=
=kxQ8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----