Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 7383.1500558803@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition (tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade failed if view contain natural left join condition
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> postgres=# create table t(n int);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# create table t1(a int);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# create view ttt1 as SELECT e.n FROM t e NATURAL LEFT JOIN t1 d;
> CREATE VIEW
You realize of course that that's a pretty useless join definition.
Still, yes, we do need to reverse-list the view with correct syntax.
Probably t LEFT JOIN t1 ON TRUE would do it.
> I think -this issue should be there in the older branches as well but
> not checked that.
[experiments] Seems to be wrong back to 9.3. Although I have a feeling
this might be a mistake in a back-patched bug fix, so that it'd depend
on which 9.3.x you looked at.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: