Re: Proposal: QUALIFY clause

It doesn't seem too crazy that extra WHEREs in WHERE clauses should some
day function as ANDs, and ditto HAVINGs, which is another reason not to
reuse HAVING for this: just to leave that a possibility, remote though
it might be.

I have a firm finger on the pulse of the standards committee, and I can guarantee that multiple WHERE clauses will never replace AND until certain people cross the river Styx.  Myself included.

My advice is to wait till QUALIFY is standardized, then hold your nose
and adopt it, or maybe sooner when it becomes clear that it will be
standardized (because so many other RDBMSes have it too).

Good advice.

-- 

Vik Fearing