Re: re-novice coming back to pgsql: porting an SQLite update statement to postgres
От | Dan Kortschak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: re-novice coming back to pgsql: porting an SQLite update statement to postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 735913e4c9601a2a7ad57d2253d74451c42ba899.camel@kortschak.io обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: re-novice coming back to pgsql: porting an SQLite update statement to postgres (Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: re-novice coming back to pgsql: porting an SQLite update statement to postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 7/23/24 13:11, Vincent Veyron wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 20:31:13 +0000 > > This is the goto page for anything SQL : > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-commands.html > > For DateTime types : > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-datetime.html > > For JSON types : > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-json.html Thanks, I will work through those. On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 23:52 +0200, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 10:35 PM Adrian Klaver > <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote: > > Just know that SQLite does not enforce types [...] > > That's true, and applies to the OP's schema. Thank you both. Yes, I was aware of this weirdness of the schema (I inherited it) and was shocked that it worked when I relaised. I'll be happier when types are properly enforced, but I don't think I can retrospectively enforce that on the SQLite implementation I have.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: