"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> I noticed an editing error in the patch I originally submitted; it
> defined the same debugging macro twice.
> I've attached a fresh copy of the patch against the current HEAD with
> the fix included.
Working through this patch now. I found one thing that seems to be
a mistake (probably an overenthusiastic search&replace): the patch
changes
- {"iy", 2, dch_date, DCH_IY, TRUE},
to
+ {"iyear", 2, DCH_IY, TRUE},
The removal of dch_date is intended, but surely the keyword should
still be "iy". I'm proceeding on that assumption, but if this change
was actually intended, please explain.
regards, tom lane