Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
От | Alena Rybakina |
---|---|
Тема | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 72eab2bf-7f94-4f58-84bc-2b80d74b6443@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes (Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 24.03.2025 13:46, Pavel Borisov wrote:
I agree with Andrey's changes and think we should fix this, because otherwise it might be inconvenient.Hi, Andrei! On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 at 14:10, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:Hi, Playing with the feature, I found a slightly irritating permutation - even if this code doesn't group any clauses, it may permute positions of the quals. See: DROP TABLE IF EXISTS main_tbl; CREATE TABLE main_tbl(id bigint, hundred int, thousand int); CREATE INDEX mt_hundred_ix ON main_tbl(hundred); CREATE INDEX mt_thousand_ix ON main_tbl(thousand); VACUUM (ANALYZE) main_tbl; SET enable_seqscan = off; EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT m.id, m.hundred, m.thousand FROM main_tbl m WHERE (m.hundred < 2 OR m.thousand < 3); Bitmap Heap Scan on public.main_tbl m Output: id, hundred, thousand Recheck Cond: ((m.thousand < 3) OR (m.hundred < 2)) -> BitmapOr -> Bitmap Index Scan on mt_thousand_ix Index Cond: (m.thousand < 3) -> Bitmap Index Scan on mt_hundred_ix Index Cond: (m.hundred < 2) Conditions on the columns "thousand" and "hundred" changed their places according to the initial positions defined in the user's SQL. It isn't okay. I see that users often use the trick of "OR order" to avoid unnecessary calculations - most frequently, Subplan evaluations. So, it makes sense to fix. In the attachment, I have included a quick fix for this issue. Although many tests returned to their initial (pre-18) state, I added some tests specifically related to this issue to make it clearer.I looked at your patch and have no objections to it. However it's clearly stated in PostgreSQL manual that nothing about the OR order is warranted [1]. So changing OR order was (and is) ok and any users query tricks about OR order may work and may not work. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-EXPRESS-EVAL
For example, without this changes we will have to have different test output files for the same query for different versions of Postres in extensions if the whole change is only related to the order of column output for a transformation that was not applied.
-- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: