Re: Materialized views WIP patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Дата
Msg-id 72AFFA40-91AF-496A-91C1-64594956082D@justatheory.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Ответы Re: Materialized views WIP patch  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mar 7, 2013, at 7:55 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:

>> If the answer to both those questions is “yes,” I think the term
>> should remain “table,” with a few mentions that the term includes
>> materialized views (and excludes foreign tables).
>
> And if the answers are "not exactly" and "yes"?

I still tend to think that the term should remain “table,” with brief mentions at the top of pages when the term should
beassumed to represent tables and matviews, and otherwise required disambiguations. 

Trying to make the least possible work for you here. :-)

David




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kevin Grittner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: odd behavior in materialized view
Следующее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: odd behavior in materialized view