Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE performance degradation (6.5.1)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE performance degradation (6.5.1)
Дата
Msg-id 7280.933087456@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE performance degradation (6.5.1)  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> and after vacuum analyze:
> -rw-------   1 postgres users        8192 Jul 27 18:54 hits
> -rw-------   1 postgres users     1703936 Jul 27 18:54 hits_pkey
> Why hits_pkey is so big ? I have only 7 rows in the table.

Looks like vacuum reclaims the extra space in the table itself,
but does not do so with indexes.  Ugh.

I've thought for some time that vacuum ought to drop and rebuild
indexes instead of trying to update them.  This might be another
reason for doing that...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rich Shepard
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [ANNOUNCE] i386 RPMs available for v6.5.1
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Bug tracking system policy