Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution
Дата
Msg-id 7263.945791236@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution  (Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>)
Список pgsql-ports
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> Also, I have noticed that some headers are #included with <>, while
> others are included with "".  Now, I understand that system headers
> should be included with <>, but I'm seeing PostgreSQL headers wrapped
> with <>.  This makes the cpp -M variants a little confusing -- while
> tracing down the header dependencies, I started using cpp -MM, which
> only follows user headers and not system headers -- but it doesn't get
> all of the headers.

Bruce has done a nice job of cleaning that up in current sources, but
yes, 6.5.* and older releases were mighty inconsistent about header
inclusions.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Lamar Owen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution
Следующее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announce: PostgreSQL-6.5.3 binaries available for Windows NT