Re: Negative value of numGroups

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Negative value of numGroups
Дата
Msg-id 721706.1653153353@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Negative value of numGroups  (Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> Next version of the patch.
> As I see, now we trying to use Cardinality type instead of double.
> So, I named casting routine as clamp_cardinality_to_long.

Pushed with a bit of rewriting of comments etc.  I left out the
test case too, because (a) for me, it did not reveal any difference
between patched and unpatched code, and (b) even if it had, it was
far too expensive to put into the core regression tests.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Implicitly created operator family not listed by pg_event_trigger_ddl_commands
Следующее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17449: Disk space not released