On 2017/03/09 11:51, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2017/03/08 16:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> Only regular tables are tested as valid objects. Testing toast tables
>>> is not worth the complication. Could you add as well a matview?
>>
>> Done in the attached updated patch.
>
> +select count(*) > 0 from pg_visibility('matview');
> + ?column?
> +----------
> + f
> +(1 row)
> That's quite a generic name :) You may want to use less common names
> in your tests.
I agree. Updated patch attached.
>
> OK, I am marking that as ready for committer.
Thanks.
Regards,
Amit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers