Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()
От
Amit Langote
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition()
Дата
Msg-id
71bf5481-9577-79e8-6ef8-f6dd70d0bd3c@lab.ntt.co.jp
Ответ на
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() (Ashutosh Bapat)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Re: [HACKERS] A bug in mapping attributes in ATExecAttachPartition() Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On 2017/07/11 19:49, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Amit Langote > wrote: > >> >> Attached updated patches. > > There's an extra "we" in > + * Note that attachRel's OID is in this list. If it's partitioned, we > + * we don't need to schedule it to be scanned (would be a noop anyway > > And some portions of the comment before find_all_inheritors() in > ATExecAttachPartition() look duplicated in portions of the code that > check constraints on the table being attached and each of its leaf > partition. > > Other than that the patches look good to me. Thanks for the review. Patch updated taking care of the comments. Regards, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Amira Shawky
Дата: