On 2018/12/17 18:10, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 05:56:08PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> You're saying that we should use plural "functions" because there of 2
>> *instances* of calling the function pg_partition_tree in the queries that
>> follow the comment, but I think that would be misleading. I think the
>> plural would make sense if we're talking about two different functions,
>> but I may be wrong.
>
> Or this could just use "Function calls"?
As far as the information content of this comment is concerned, I think
it'd be more useful to word this comment such that it is applicable to
different functions than to word it such that it is applicable to
different queries. More opinions would be nice.
> My argument is just to not
> forget about updating this comment later on and minimize future noise
> diffs.
Okay, how about:
-- Various partitioning-related functions return NULL if passed relations
-- of types that cannot be part of a partition tree; for example, views,
-- materialized views, etc.
Thanks,
Amit