RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement
От | Peter Mount |
---|---|
Тема | RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 714F8949628ED1119E0F0060082C52F509521E@vesta.maidstone.gov.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bingo, you got it in one. There are only two businesses who call their customers 'users' -----Original Message----- From: Meskes, Michael [mailto:meskes@topsystem.de] Sent: Friday, May 08, 1998 10:26 AM To: 'Peter Mount'; 'Meskes, Michael'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart' Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker' Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement Let me try. Hmm, something from Microsoft? :-) Michael -- Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20 meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44 Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10 > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Mount [SMTP:peter@maidstone.gov.uk] > Sent: Friday, May 08, 1998 10:44 AM > To: 'Meskes, Michael'; 'Peter Mount'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart' > Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker' > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement > > [resent as the local mail system screwed up - 10 points to guess what > system > it is ;-) ] > > > Okay, I'm willing to add it to either libecpg or (preferable imn my > > mind) to libpq. I'd also like to add my (old style) syntax if no one > > objects. > > I don't see why not. Handling both won't expand libpq by that much. > > -- > Peter T Mount, peter@maidstone.gov.uk, peter@retep.org.uk > Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please cc > my > home address. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Mount [SMTP:peter@maidstone.gov.uk] > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 5:23 PM > > To: 'Meskes, Michael'; 'Peter Mount'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart' > > Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker' > > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement > > > > I'm not sure about libpq as I've never used either with it. However, > > URL-style does seem to be the in thing at the moment. > > > > -- > > Peter T Mount, peter@maidstone.gov.uk, peter@retep.org.uk > > Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please > cc > > my > > home address. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Meskes, Michael [mailto:meskes@topsystem.de] > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 2:42 PM > > To: 'Peter Mount'; 'Michael Meskes'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart' > > Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker' > > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement > > > > > > Great. Do we implement this in libpq? > > > > And do we implement the old style syntax with '@', too? > > > > Michael > > > > -- > > Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH > > meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. > 20 > > meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen > > Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44 > > Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Peter Mount [SMTP:peter@maidstone.gov.uk] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 07, 1998 3:27 PM > > > To: 'Michael Meskes'; 'Thomas G. Lockhart' > > > Cc: 'PostgreSQL Hacker' > > > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Decicision needed for connect statement > > > > > > > Is there any benefit to using a url-style spec? > > > > > > > > postgres://server:port/dbname > > > > > > > > Very fashionable :) > > > > > > This would be in line to JDBC's url-style: > > > > > > jdbc:postgresql://server:port/dbname?options > > > > > > -- > > > Peter T Mount, peter@maidstone.gov.uk, peter@retep.org.uk > > > Please note that this is from my works email. If you reply, please > > cc > > > my > > > home address. > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: