Re: New FSM allocation policy

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> There may
>> be no very good way to do that without maintaining some shared state,
>> ie the last page handed out.

> We could put an extra field on the FSM root page. Hmm, it doesn't 
> actually need to be a single global field, so we could have a field like 
> that on every FSM page, for better concurrency.

Yeah, that would work, and it is only a hint so you needn't WAL-log
changing it.
        regards, tom lane