Moshe Jacobson <moshe@neadwerx.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> AFAICS, the eight
>> un-removed joins are either joining to non-unique keys, or can't be
>> removed because their tables are needed to provide joining columns for
>> un-removable joins.
> My point is that even if the column to which we are joining is a non-unique
> key, there should be no need to look at that table if the output does not
> include any values from that table, and there are no filters on that
> table's values, and all output columns are in the GROUP BY. Is the planner
> not smart enough to notice this?
No. There is nothing about GROUP BY in the join removal logic.
regards, tom lane