Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan
Дата
Msg-id 7071.1168440822@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
I wrote:
> ... What seems to be happening is that Informix is willing to
> flatten the sub-SELECT into an IN join even though the sub-SELECT is
> correlated to the outer query (that is, it contains outer references).

I did some googling this morning and found confirmation that recent
versions of Informix have pretty extensive support for optimizing
correlated subqueries:
http://www.iiug.org/waiug/archive/iugnew83/FeaturesIDS73.htm

This is something we've not really spent much time on for Postgres,
but it might be interesting to look at someday.  Given that the problem
with your query was really a mistake anyway, I'm not sure that your
example is compelling evidence for making it a high priority.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Florian Weimer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum
Следующее
От: "Jeremy Haile"
Дата:
Сообщение: Slow inner join, but left join is fast