Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Andrey Borodin
Тема
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data
Дата
Msg-id
70405D84-B779-4F41-851B-643027DA2EB4@yandex-team.ru
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY does not index prepared xact's data Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>


> 31 окт. 2021 г., в 12:31, Sandeep Thakkar  написал(а):
> 
> Here is the stack trace:
Thanks Sandeep!

So far I didn't come up with a clear understanding how this might happen.

The only idea I have:
1. It seems equalTupleDescs() got two valid pointers, probably with broken data.
2. Maybe relation->rd_rel (alloceted just before relation->rd_att) was used incorrectly?
3. This could happen if CLASS_TUPLE_SIZE is calculated wrong. Don't we need to MAXALIGN everything due to added sizeof(relminmxid)?
#define CLASS_TUPLE_SIZE \
     (offsetof(FormData_pg_class,relminmxid) + sizeof(TransactionId))

The idea doesn't seem very strong but that's only 2 cents I have. Noah, what do you think?

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
FAQ