Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 702138.1752514835@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: please define 'statement' in the glossary
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > If we accept that we use the words statement and command interchangeably > then the sole remaining use of command here sticks out because now we have > to explain why commands are different from statements. I'd rather just > remove the parenthetical. It's poorly clarifying a point that it seems you > don't want to clarify more fully here. [ shrug... ] I'm inclined to go back to the "command message" wording then. I don't find "client-issued statement" to be helpful at all; in particular, it's flat wrong for the multi-statement-query-message case, because surely all those statements are client-issued. I'm okay with this text leaving out nitpicky details, but it should leave the reader with a mental model that more or less matches reality. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: