On Wed, 25 May 2005 18:19:19 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:
>> but it keeps a list (hash table, file, whatever) of those blocks.
>> [...] Is it sufficient to
>> remember just the relation and the block number or do we need the
>> contents a well?
>
>We don't *have* the contents ... that's exactly why it's panicking ...
I meant the contents of the WAL record, not the original block
contents. Anyway, I think it's not needed.
ServusManfred