Re: Timestamp with vs without time zone.
| От | Laurenz Albe |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Timestamp with vs without time zone. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6fecaaa93b51b57cd8dd52312a25db79a337bd4b.camel@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Timestamp with vs without time zone. (Tim Uckun <timuckun@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Aw: Re: Timestamp with vs without time zone.
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 19:35 +1200, Tim Uckun wrote: > It seems like it would be so much more useful if the timestamp with > time zone type actually stored the time zone in the record. This has been requested before, and it would be closer to the intention of the SQL standard, but I guess it won't happen. For one, it would change on-disk storage, which would make it impossible to use pg_upgrade. It also would require timestamps to occupy more than 8 bytes. The best solution is probably to explicitly store the time zone as an additional column. Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: