Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL
Дата
Msg-id 6ebe7f1f-bf37-2688-2ac1-a081d278367c@iki.fi
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
Ответы Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Re: Incorrect allocation handling for cryptohash functions with OpenSSL  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 18/12/2020 11:35, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> BTW, looking at pg_cryptohash_ctx and pg_cryptohash_state, why do we
> need two structs? They're both allocated and controlled by the
> cryptohash implementation. It would seem simpler to have just one.

Something like this. Passes regression tests, but otherwise untested.

- Heikki
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Deadlock between backend and recovery may not be detected
Следующее
От: Gilles Darold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUG] orphaned function