Re: BUG #15044: materialized views incompatibility with logicalreplication in postgres 10

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: BUG #15044: materialized views incompatibility with logicalreplication in postgres 10
Дата
Msg-id 6e375316-91a4-7825-ef8b-9b8915ab6980@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #15044: materialized views incompatibility with logicalreplication in postgres 10  (Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #15044: materialized views incompatibility with logicalreplication in postgres 10
Список pgsql-bugs
On 2/5/18 10:33, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> Exactly.  The matview does not show up in pg_publication_tables but it's
>> registered at some level.
> 
> Indeed this is a bug. For normal publications we take care of this when
> adding the relation to the publication but since ALL TABLES publications
> don't check for membership we have to filter this directly in the output
> plugin.

I think the filtering in pgoutput ought to make use of
is_publishable_class() in some way.  That takes care of non-tables such
as materialized views, but it also filters out the information_schema
tables for example.  Right now, if you insert something into one of the
IS tables, it gets shipped over the wire but is then dropped by the
apply because there is no pg_subscription_rel entry of the table.  That
doesn't quite have the user-visible effect as this bug, but it's bogus
nonetheless.

So I propose this alternative patch that covers all these cases.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Вложения

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bradley Ayers
Дата:
Сообщение: Transaction local custom settings set to '' rather than removedentirely after transaction ends
Следующее
От: PG Bug reporting form
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #15072: Unable to get tablespace from pg_tables for new createdtable