Re: The tragedy of SQL
| От | Rob Sargent |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: The tragedy of SQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6dcd9c8f-c759-5f0c-8e6c-393af06fe456@gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: The tragedy of SQL (David Goodenough <david.goodenough@broadwellmanor.co.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: The tragedy of SQL
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Ah, lets not forget Mr Lane's favourite: quel> ORMs a function of poor development culture and vendor advocacy, not
> the fault of SQL. If developers don't understand or are unwilling to
> use joins in language A, they won't in language B either.
>
> merlin
Back in the day, within IBM there were two separate relational databases. System-R (which came from San Hose) and PRTV (the Peterlee Relational Test vehicle). As I understand it SQL came from System-R and the optimizer (amongst other things) came from PRTV.
PRTV (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Peterlee_Relational_Test_Vehicle_(PRTV)) did not use SQL, and was never a released product, except with a graphical add-on which was sold to two UK local authorities for urban planning.
So there are (and always have been) different ways to send requests to a relational DB, it is just that SQL won the day.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: