On 2019-12-03 12:44, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 12:09 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz
> <mailto:michael@paquier.xyz>> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:10:57AM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Is 1.0.1 considered a separate major from 1.0.0, in this
> reasoning? Because
> > while retiring 1.0.0 should probably not be that terrible, 1.0.1
> is still
> > in very widespread use on most long term supported distributions.
>
> 1.0.1 and 1.0.0 are two different major releases in the OpenSSL world,
> so my suggestion would be to cut support for everything which does not
> have TLSv1.2, meaning that we keep compatibility with 1.0.1 for
> a longer period.
>
>
> Good, that's what I thought you meant :) And that makes it sound like a
> working plan to me.
This would mean we'd stop support for RHEL 5, which is probably OK,
seeing that even the super-extended support ends in November 2020.
Dropping RHEL 5 would also allow us to drop support for Python 2.4,
which is something I've been itching to do. ;-)
In both of these cases, maintaining support for all these ancient
versions is a significant burden IMO, so it would be good to clean up
the tail end a bit.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services