Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6c78e772-0c1b-4a8f-ab14-d673a086d35e@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text
Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11.10.23 03:08, Jeff Davis wrote: > * unicode_is_valid(text): returns true if all codepoints are > assigned, false otherwise We need to be careful about precise terminology. "Valid" has a defined meaning for Unicode. A byte sequence can be valid or not as UTF-8. But a string containing unassigned code points is not not-"valid" as Unicode. > * unicode_version(): version of unicode Postgres is built with > * icu_unicode_version(): version of Unicode ICU is built with This seems easy enough, but it's not clear what users would actually do with that.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: