On 24.04.24 15:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
>> On 24.04.24 11:59, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
>>> I noticed that a permission check is performed in be_lo_put()
>>> just after returning inv_open(), but teh permission should be
>>> already checked in inv_open(), so I think we can remove this
>>> part of codes. I attached a patch for this fix.
>
>> Yes, I think you are right.
>
> I agree. Do you want to do the honors?
done