Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
Дата
Msg-id 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7631@Herge.rcsinc.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-hackers-win32
> MS is big enough and bad enough to get all the info they need from the
> various drive makers to know how to handle write cache flushing. Even
the
> stuff that isn't documented.

Yup.  This includes all the raid controllers I've tested...

> Also, I would like to see this test performed on NTFS and FAT32, and
see
> if you are more likely to lose data on FAT32.

FAT32 is not journaling...you could see corruption at the filesystem
level, not to mention the fact that windows would want to run chkdsk
every time the system reboots.

Merlin



В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Slony1-general] Slony under win32
Следующее
От: "Merlin Moncure"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question