Re: fsync vs open_sync

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Merlin Moncure
Тема Re: fsync vs open_sync
Дата
Msg-id 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A749A@Herge.rcsinc.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: fsync vs open_sync
Список pgsql-performance
> >     There is also the fact that NTFS is a very slow filesystem, and
> > Linux is
> > a lot better than Windows for everything disk, caching and IO related.
> Try
> > to copy some files in NTFS and in ReiserFS...
>
> I'm not so sure I would agree with such a blanket generalization.  I find
> NTFS to be very fast, my main complaint is fragmentation issues...I bet
> NTFS is better than ext3 at most things (I do agree with you about the
> cache, thoughO.

Ok, you were right.  I made some tests and NTFS is just not very good in the general case.  I've seen some benchmarks
forReiser4 that are just amazing. 

Merlin

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vivek Khera
Дата:
Сообщение: restoring to wrong encoding db
Следующее
От: Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: fsync vs open_sync