Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management
| От | Amit kapila |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C383BC786B2@szxeml509-mbx обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer Management (Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [WIP PATCH] for Performance Improvement in Buffer
Management
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, November 19, 2012 8:52 PM Amit kapila wrote: On Monday, November 19, 2012 5:53 AM Jeff Janes wrote: On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:59 AM, Amit kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com> wrote: > On Saturday, October 20, 2012 11:03 PM Jeff Janes wrote: > >>Run the modes in reciprocating order? >>> Sorry, I didn't understood this, What do you mean by modes in reciprocating order? >> By reciprocating, I mean to run them in the reverse order, or in random order. > Today for some configurations, I have ran by reciprocating the order. The detailed data for all other various configuration is attached with this mail. > The 2 problems which are observed in V-Tune Profiler Reports for Buffer Management are: > a. Partition Lock > b. Buf-Free List Lock > Tommorow, I will send you some of the profiler reports for different scenario where the above is observed. Still not able to prepare reoprt. Shall try tommorow. With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: