Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
От | Amit kapila |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C3828531CC1@szxeml509-mbs обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE
protocol
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, September 10, 2012 8:20 PM Amit Kapila wrote: On Sunday, September 09, 2012 1:37 PM Amit Kapila wrote: On Friday, September 07, 2012 11:19 PM Tom Lane wrote: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: >>> Would socketpair(2) be simpler? >>>I've not done anything yet about the potential security issues >>>associated with untrusted libpq connection strings. I think this >>is still at the proof-of-concept stage; in particular, it's probably >> time to see if we can make it work on Windows before we worry more >>about that. > I have started working on this patch to make it work on Windows. The 3 main things to make it work are: The patch which contains Windows implementation as well is attached with this mail. It contains changes related to following 1. waitpid 2. socketpair 3. fork-exec The following is still left: 1. Error handling in all paths 2. During test, I found if i try to run with admin user, it throws error but psql doesn't comes out. I will look into this issue. However as in previous mail discussion there is a decision pending whether in standalonemode we need admin user behavior. 3. Will do some more test in Windows. Currently I have prepared a patch on top of your changes, please let me know if that is okay. Also, it will be better for me if you can tell me how I can further contribute. With Regards, Amit Kapila
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: