Re: dblink un-named connection doesn't get re-used

Sorry for the self-reply...

On Oct 18, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Decibel! wrote:
> Is it intentional that dblink's unnamed connections don't get re-used?
From the dblink docs (both 8.1 and HEAD):
    if only one argument is given, the connection is unnamed; only  
one unnamed    connection can exist at a time

So this sounds to me like a bug.
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828