> > Jeremy Drake <pgsql@jdrake.com> writes:
> > > The errors I got on this file were:
> > > 1>bootparse.tab.c(1065) : error C2449: found '{' at file scope
> > > 1>(missing function header?)
> >
> > I looked at this. Line 1065 is the left brace starting
> yyparse(). On
> > my Fedora Core 5 box with Bison 2.1 installed, the stuff
> leading up to
> > it is
> >
> > #ifdef YYPARSE_PARAM
> > ... some uninteresting stuff, since we don't define
> YYPARSE_PARAM ...
> > #else /* ! YYPARSE_PARAM */
> > #if defined (__STDC__) || defined (__cplusplus) int yyparse (void)
> > #else int yyparse ()
> >
> > #endif
> > #endif
> > {
> >
> > But lookee here, your Windows-built version has
> >
> > #ifdef YYPARSE_PARAM
> > ...
> > #else /* ! YYPARSE_PARAM */
> > #if defined (__STDC__) || defined (__cplusplus) int yyparse (void)
> > #else int yyparse ()
> > ;
> > #endif
> > #endif
> > {
> >
> > So that semicolon is the source of the trouble. That's clearly a
> > bison bug, and in fact digging in Red Hat's SRPM shows that
> they are
> > carrying a patch for it:
> >
> > 2005-10-05 Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> >
> > * data/m4sugar/m4sugar.m4 (_m4_map): New macro.
> > (m4_map, m4_map_sep): Use it. Handle the empty list correctly.
> >
> <snip patch>
> >
> > Presumably bison 2.2 includes this fix. But I guess the
> real question
> > is why the devil doesn't MSVC define __STDC__ ? Are they that far
> > removed from spec compliance?
>
> In the bison 2.2 generated code, the #if check is
>
> #if (defined __STDC__ || defined __C99__FUNC__ \
> || defined __cplusplus || defined _MSC_VER)
>
> which looks like they figured out that they needed to check
> for MicroSoft C explicitly. I have no idea why they do not
> define __STDC__ however.
Can we just define __STDC__ when compiling that file (or rather, when
compiling any bison-generated output file)? Or is that likely to cause
*other* issues?
//Magnus