Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()
Дата
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F7E9@algol.sollentuna.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на possible design bug with PQescapeString()  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > > > But actually I'd argue that
> > > > letting the client programmer supply the encoding is still a
> > > > pretty dangerous practice.  Your example demonstrates
> that if the
> > > > encoding PQescapeString is told is different from the
> encoding the
> > > > backend parser thinks is in use, problems result.  Perhaps we
> > > > should pass the PGconn to new-PQescapeString and let it
> dig the client encoding out of that.
> > >
> > > Sound good to pass PGconn to new-PQescapeString. Here is the
> > > proposed calling sequence for the new function:
> > >
> > > size_t PQescapeStringWithConn (const PGconn *conn, char
> *to, const
> > > char *from, size_t length)
> > >
> > > If this is ok, I will implement for 8.2.
>
> Here is the promised patches for 8.2. If there's no
> objection, I will commit tomorrow.

Just a reminder - to work on win32, the new function needs an entry in
exports.txt.

//Magnus


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()
Следующее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: possible design bug with PQescapeString()