Re: postmaster.pid

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: postmaster.pid
Дата
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE475B1E@algol.sollentuna.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: postmaster.pid
Список pgsql-hackers-win32
> > I think it's better to call uor named pipe. That way we'll
> find out if
> > it's actually a postmaster of ours or a different process
> alltogether
> > there.
>
> I'm not sure that's a good idea. The function is there to
> emulate the unix kill() which doesn't care what the process
> is. Changing the code as you suggest could cause confusionon
> Windows if someone uses kill() for other purposes.

Why would they link with libpgport if they use it for other purposes?
;-)

But sure, we don't really care if it's a postmaster. Then OpenProcess()
is probably the best way, yes.

//Magnus

В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postmaster.pid
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: postmaster.pid