Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Дата
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE2A6948@algol.sollentuna.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Список pgsql-hackers-win32
> Having read through this massive thread, I concluded the
> CONNX signal stuff is the way to go.  Where there any Win32
> TODO items in there?  I didn't see any.

Well. There is one in the form of "make signal handlers thread-safe or
defer non-threadsafe handlers".
But before we're committed down that path, I think we need someone with
really good knowledge in those signal handlers to comment on wether this
sounsd reasonable at all, or if it iwll be too much work. I know I don't
have that knowledge, and from what I read we've had nobody speak up yet.

Basically, we want signal handlers to run on a separate thread from the
main processing.


//Magnus

В списке pgsql-hackers-win32 по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: libpq.dll for win32 always using ssl
Следующее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Pipes vs Events