Re: win32 inode fix

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: win32 inode fix
Дата
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE1715D6@algol.sollentuna.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на win32 inode fix  (Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com>)
Ответы Re: win32 inode fix  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-patches
> Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes:
> > Under Win32, stat() returns an st_ino field, but it has no
> meaning (on
> > Win2K, and possibly all Win32 variants, it is always 0).
>
> MSDN says:
>
>     Number of the information node (the inode) for the file
>     (UNIX-specific). On UNIX file systems, the inode describes the
>     file date and time stamps, permissions, and content. When files
>     are hard-linked to one another, they share the same inode. The
>     inode, and therefore st_ino, has no meaning in the FAT, HPFS, or
>     NTFS file systems.
>
> I wonder if this might return non-zero for some relatively
> rare Win32 filesystems (say, an NFS share mounted via MS
> Services For Unix). Perhaps it might be cleaner to consider a
> zero inode "unknown", and therefore not equal to anything else?

It still returns 0 on a NFS share mounted with SFU (just tested). My bet
is that it will always return 0.

Might still be cleaner to change the code to make "zero equals unknown".
Is there a risk of another filesystem om some platform that won't return
inode?

//mha

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] dollar quoting
Следующее
От: "Mark Cave-Ayland"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ANALYZE patch for review