Re: bytea vs. pg_dump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bernd Helmle
Тема Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Дата
Msg-id 6A9D2E5442CE71DC2A7190F4@teje
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bytea vs. pg_dump  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: bytea vs. pg_dump  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
--On Dienstag, Juli 21, 2009 16:49:45 -0400 Andrew Dunstan 
<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

> You just tested COPY, not pg_dump, right? Some pg_dump numbers would be
> interesting, both for text and custom formats.

Plain COPY, yes. I planned testing pg_dump for this round of my review but 
ran out of time unfortunately.

The restore might be limited by xlog (didn't realize that the profile shows 
XLogInsert in  the top four). I'll try to get some additional numbers soon, 
but this won't happen before thursday.

--  Thanks
                   Bernd


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object